Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: RE: Means for Metan
From
Aggie Chidlow <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: RE: Means for Metan
Date
Mon, 12 Apr 2010 22:36:04 +0100
Thank you very much for this. Good night!
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:32 PM, Nick Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sorry, that was wrong, I think:
>
> su wt [fw=j1]
> su wt [fw=j2]
> ...
>
> Just using _n for observation and frequency weights.
>
> [U] 13.4 System variables
> [U] 11.1.6 Weights
>
> Nick
> [email protected]
>
> Aggie Chidlow
>
> Thanks Nick,
> This is good, but could you suggest something for me to read about it,
> please? I would like to understand what I am doing not just copy your
> work. Thanks
>
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:14 PM, Nick Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
>> That's a bit clearer. Thanks.
>>
>> On the understanding that the first, second, ... observation contain
> information for 0, 1, ... mentions
>>
>> gen wt = _n - 1
>> su j? [fw=wt]
>>
>> Nick
>> [email protected]
>>
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/