Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Re: st: RE: AW: ratio function
From
"Roman Kasal" <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
RE: Re: st: RE: AW: ratio function
Date
Fri, 2 Apr 2010 08:46:41 +0200
I don't agree...so how to do it when you want to find out ratio between
years, male X female, ...? So there is no solution? Just to keep N,mean,
SE, degrees of freedom, N_strata, N_psu, .... and calculate it manually?
I think it is not appropriate solution, at least to have it as an
option. I think there is missing a lot with complex survey in Stata and
complex survey is needed for almost every survey research, even freeware
R-project is better equipped :(
so have a hope Stata will get it soon....immediately we are buying it
again :)
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steven
Samuels
Sent: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 09:30:10 -0400
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: st: RE: AW: ratio function
And it should. Data (x,y) (1,2) (2,4) (3,6) (100,.) will give an
entirely different view of the data if the unpaired observation is
included in a mean or ratio calculation. Or consider data with x
missing in half the pairs and y missing in the other half; the ratio
of means would be meaningless.
The formulas for standard errors for ratios assume that the data are
paired. Formally, they are based on the residual MSE of a regression
of y on x through the origin. You cannot do that regression with
unpaired data.
If your concern is missing data, the solution is to impute the missing
values before analysis.
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Roman Kasal
> but it ignores unpaired data :(
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/