Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: RE: Interpretation of quadratic terms
From
Rosie Chen <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: RE: Interpretation of quadratic terms
Date
Tue, 9 Mar 2010 12:37:04 -0800 (PST)
Thanks a lot to Nick and Richard for the useful information and resources too. Will check them out and have a try soon!
Rosie
----- Original Message ----
From: Richard Williams <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Sent: Mon, March 8, 2010 7:12:43 PM
Subject: RE: st: RE: Interpretation of quadratic terms
At 06:57 PM 3/8/2010, Lachenbruch, Peter wrote:
> A couple of posts noted a) using residuals after logit or logistic gives you Pearson residuals (obs-expected)/sqrt(var), b) after glm you get observed -expected (and get the two straight lines).
>
> Check out the postestimation stuff for logit and glm and you'll see what I mean. Also, try this on the auto data - e.g. predicting foreign.
If you mean the 2 straight lines, I show this on p. 4 of
http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam/stats2/l81.pdf
-------------------------------------------
Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology
OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463
HOME: (574)289-5227
EMAIL: [email protected]
WWW: http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/