Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: st: RE: Interpretation of quadratic terms
From
Richard Williams <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
Subject
RE: st: RE: Interpretation of quadratic terms
Date
Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:13:54 -0500
At 05:06 PM 3/8/2010, Lachenbruch, Peter wrote:
When you think about it, the residual will be 1-predicted or
0-predicted. Thus, they will plot as two parallel straight lines.
Correct. I think that is why you don't even get the usual resid = y
- yhat as an option with the predict command after logit:
Main
pr probability of a positive outcome; the default
xb xb, fitted values
stdp standard error of the prediction
* dbeta Pregibon Delta-Beta influence statistic
* deviance deviance residual
* dx2 Hosmer and Lemeshow Delta chi-squared influence statistic
* ddeviance Hosmer and Lemeshow Delta-D influence statistic
* hat Pregibon leverage
* number sequential number of the covariate pattern
* residuals Pearson residuals; adjusted for number sharing
covariate pattern
* rstandard standardized Pearson residuals; adjusted for
number sharing covariate pattern
score first derivative of the log likelihood with respect to xb
-------------------------------------------
Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology
OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463
HOME: (574)289-5227
EMAIL: [email protected]
WWW: http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/