...
Have a look at -nmissing-.
It's user-written, so if you haven't already installed it, type -findit nmissing-
______________________________________________
Kieran McCaul MPH PhD
WA Centre for Health & Ageing (M573)
University of Western Australia
Level 6, Ainslie House
48 Murray St
Perth 6000
Phone: (08) 9224-2701
Fax: (08) 9224 8009
email: [email protected]
http://myprofile.cos.com/mccaul
http://www.researcherid.com/rid/B-8751-2008
______________________________________________
If you live to be one hundred, you've got it made.
Very few people die past that age - George Burns
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rodrigo Briceño
Sent: Wednesday, 18 November 2009 12:49 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: st: missing values
Dear Stata listers.
I'm using windows XP and stata 9.2. I'm running some econometric
models and when I got the output I can see the number of observations
that were used in the estimation.
Since my database has several missing values for almost all variables
I would like to know if there is some command-function that allow me
to see which combination of variables will produce the regression with
the highest avaialble number of non-missing observations.
The procedure that I'm using to do this implies to quit and replace
variables and see how the number of observations used change.
thanks for your time
--
Rodrigo Briceño
Economist
+506 22-91-12-00 ext. 113 Office
+506 22-32-08-30 Fax
[email protected]
MSN: [email protected]
SKYPE: rbriceno1087
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
