Sorry, but my answer's essentially the same, but based on more
information this time.
Regardless of what is difficult to believe, neither help file nor code
for -reoprob- say anything about fixed effects.
As is now plain, -reoprob- is essentially a decade old.
The alternatives are in essence that you rewrite -reoprob- to do this or
that there is a quite different program to do what you want. Others may
have good news on the second front.
It is common that programmers write to solve their own problem and stop
when they have done so.
Nick
[email protected]
Tim Waring
I am working with a user-package call REOPROB, which comes from:
> -reoprob- is a program published in the Stata Technical Bulletin:
>
> STB-61 sg158.1 . . . . . . . . . . . Update to random-effects
> ordered
> probit (help reoprob, ghquadm if installed) . . . . . . . . G. R.
> Frechette 5/01 p.12; STB Reprints Vol 10, pp.266--267 correction
> to solve occasional abort in maximization
>
> STB-59 sg158 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Random-effects
> ordered
> probit (help reoprob, ghquadm if installed) . . . . . . . . G. R.
> Frechette 1/01 pp.23--27; STB Reprints Vol 10, pp.261--266
> estimates a random-effects ordered probit model
I need to fix both fixed and random effects within an ordered probit
model. REOPROB is the package for this, and I can't believe that it
would NOT have the facility to fit FIXED effects as well as random
ones, but I can't find documentation on how to fit fixed effects.
Anyone know anything about REOPROB?
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
