<>
Do you have any intention of processing the "misslist" further, apart from
-tokenize-ing it? If not, the lines
*******
local misslist = ".a .b .c .d .e" // five should be enough
tokenize `misslist'
*******
could be just
*******
tokenize ".a .b .c .d .e"
*******
and you could be just as happy...
HTH
Martin
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Lacy
Sent: Mittwoch, 28. Oktober 2009 19:29
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: st: Keep value labels after -mvdecode-
My question is not identical to the original subject but close enough
to preserve the same subject and thread:
Elan Cohen: wrote:
>My data consists of different types of missing values currently
stored as >negative integers. I'm using -mvdecode- to code them as
missing, but I'd >like to tranfer the value labels along with it. Is
this possible?
My situation is a more general case, I think. I have a listing of
which values denote some kind of missing data situation for each of
several hundred variables. I want to recode them to missing (.a, .b,
...) and retain the original value labels. I cannot rely on the same
numerical codes being used to denote the same missing value
situations for different variables. So, for example, I might have:
maritalstatus 0 9
ethnicity 0 99
where the value labels for maritalstatus are 0 = "refused", and 9 =
"not applicable because of age"; and the variable labels for
ethnicity are 0 = "question skipped for this respondent" and 99 =
"respondent undecided".
The desired outcome would be that for maritalstatus, 0 is recoded to
.a, and 9 to .b, with the marital status label modified so that .a
has the label "refused" and .b has not applicable...". Ethnicity
would be handled in parallel, but not identically, given the
different meaning of 0.
The only solution I could come up with, which worked but seemed
inconvenient, was to do the recode for each value, put the value
label into a local, modify the label, reassign it, etc.
prog rectomiss // handles the recode for one variable
args varname v1 v2 v3 v4 v5 //clumsy I know
local misslist = ".a .b .c .d .e" // five should be enough
tokenize `misslist'
local i = 1
foreach val of numlist `v1' `v2' `v3' `v4' `v5' {
local misscode = ``i''
recode `varname' (`val' = `misscode')
local ++i
local labelname: value label `varname'
if "`labelname'" != "" { //blank
local lblstrg: label(`varname') `val'
label define `labelname' `misscode' "`lblstrg'", add
label values `varname' `labelname'
}
}
// sample usage
// rectomiss ethnicity 0 99
// rectomiss maritalstatus 0 99
This seemed quite a bit of messing around for a simple task, a.though
the execution for fast. Are there simpler ways to do this? I'd find
that instructive.
(The application, by the way, might be of interest to some U.S.
social scientists. The Stata version of the General Social Survey
files are distributed with a do-file to recode all the missing values
codes to ".", which loses the original value labels and distinctions
for different reasons for missing values. If I had a decent simpler
way to do what I did above, I'd pass it on to the folks that
distribute the data.)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Mike Lacy
Fort Collins CO USA
(970) 491-6721 office
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
