|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: how to indicate rho, sigma, and lambda in treatreg using estout
From |
Stas Kolenikov <[email protected]> |
To |
[email protected] |
Subject |
Re: st: how to indicate rho, sigma, and lambda in treatreg using estout |
Date |
Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:54:34 -0500 |
/lnsigma and /arthrho are the additional equations estimated by
-treatreg-. The reported coefficients are nonlinear transformations of
these. You should be able to make -estout- report the original
equations with -equations()- option, and you need to specify
-transform()- option to get the sigma and rho. The lambda is the
product of rho and sigma. It gets reported by somewhat more
complicated machinery than -estout- uses, so I doubt whether you could
get it in your output.
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 2:18 AM, N Fukugawa <[email protected]> wrote:
> statalisters,
> i ran treatment regression model using estout in stata11.
>
> bys sector2: eststo: treatreg tfpg lsales esty , treat(bca= sub
> subsidiary ,noc)
>
> estout using estout.txt, starlevels(* 0.05 ** 0.01) cells(b(star
> fmt(4)) se( fmt(4))) numbers("Model ") mlabels(, depvar)
> collabels(none) stats(r2_p N cmd, fmt(%9.3f %9.0g)) replace
>
> although the result window of stata indicates rho, sigma, and lambda
> as follows, they do not appear in estout.txt.
> furthermore, i would like to include the result of wald test for rho
> (0.0000 in this case) in estout.txt.
> thank you in advance.
>
> -------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
> /athrho | -.3747398 .0711001 -5.27 0.000 -.5140933 -.2353862
> /lnsigma | -1.703365 .0153075 -111.28 0.000 -1.733367 -1.673362
> -------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
> rho | -.3581306 .0619809 -.4731284 -.2311331
> sigma | .1820699 .002787 .1766885 .1876152
> lambda | -.0652048 .0121928 -.0891022 -.0413074
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Wald test of indep. eqns. (rho = 0): chi2(1) = 27.78 Prob > chi2 = 0.0000
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
--
Stas Kolenikov, also found at http://stas.kolenikov.name
Small print: I use this email account for mailing lists only.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/