Thank you Martin! I've ordered the article and I'll review these commands.
On 8/25/09, Martin Weiss <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> <>
>
>
> ******
> -ssc d parmest-
> -ssc d estout-
> ******
>
> could be for you. Also note the command -postfile-,
> http://www.stata-journal.com/article.html?article=pr0036
>
>
> HTH
> Martin
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von John Hansen
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. August 2009 16:58
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: st: going from a 2x2 table to a listing with results from many of
> them
>
> Hello!
>
> I apologize if this is a duplicate post. I sent originally just as I
> became a list subscriber and I didn't receive any replies. This in
> itself doesn't necessarily indicate nobody saw my message. There are
> lots of reasons why I might not have received a reply. I looked in
> the conversation threads though and didn't see my post either so I
> fear statalist may not have recognized me as a subscriber yet.
>
> I'm trying to venture away from menu driven work into some
> programming. I know that there's probably a way to do what I want and
> I'm hoping that someone can point me in the right direction. I don't
> necessarily need specifics... I'm hoping for at least a nudge! (And I
> have a couple of stata programming books en route to me as well!)
>
> I'm comparing cumulative incidence data in two groups, say exposed and
> unexposed for a set of outcomes (outcome1, outcome2, etc.). So
> consider that for each outcome I could make up a 2x2 table showing
> combinations of exposed cases (a), unexposed cases (b), exposed
> controls (c) and unexposed controls (d). So I currently have my data
> structured like this:
>
> outcome1 a1 b1 c1 d1
> outcome2 a2 b2 c2 d2
> ...
> outcomen an bn cn dn
>
> If I were just producing a 2x2 table for outcome1, I could easily
> produce an OR, lower and upper CI, p-value, etc. Same for every other
> row in the set... I know there must be a simple concept that allows me
> to get to something like this
>
> OUTCOME A B C D OR CI:LL CI:UL Pvalue
> outcome1 a1 b1 c1 d1 OR1 LL1 UL1 pvalue1
> outcome2 a2 b2 c2 d2 OR2 LL2 UL2 pvalue2
> ...
> outcomen an bn cn dn ORn LLn ULn pvaluen
>
> If I've got several hundred outcomes, is this best done looping
> through the dataset and building a table of results? Or is there an
> easier way to do this?
>
> I appreciate any pointers. Thanks!
>
> John Hansen
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
