All explained. -wls0-, not -wsl0-. I suppose the weighted least squares
should have been a good hint, but programming makes one utterly literal.
Sorry for any confusion I contributed.
Nick
[email protected]
Nick Cox
Odd. We should be accessing exactly the same database.
Nick
[email protected]
Martin Weiss
See https://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ado/analysis/wls0.htm
It is a command by Phil Ender, found it on my very first attempt via
findit wls0
Nick Cox
I typed the zero, originally and just now, and I can't find it on
-findit-.
In any case Statalist protocol is that you should identify non-official
commands yourself and say where they came from.
Philipp Meinen
it is identifiable via -findit-. I made a mistake in the earlier mail,
it is wls0, where the "0" is a zero.
> Von: "Nick Cox" <[email protected]>
> This refers to a -wsl0- command which is not part of official Stata
and
> not identifiable via -findit-.
>
> [email protected]
>
> I have a problem with weighted least squares where I cannot find a
> solution to. I use the wsl0 command to obtain the results; however,
> there are two things I am confused about:
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
