Erasmo,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> Erasmo Giambona
> Sent: 27 January 2009 08:39
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: st: RE: 3200 conformability error: XTIVREG2
> versus XTIVREG
>
> Dear Mark,
>
> I have also contacted STATA support about this error. They have spent
> quite some time running my code to check where the problem comes from
> but couldn't find a solution. However, they found out that the error
> comes from rkstat.
>
> I would appreciate if you have any suggestions on what else I
> could do.
Can you contact me off-list with more details of your code and dataset?
I can then try debugging to see where the problem is.
In the meantime, you can probably get -xtivreg2- to run without error if
you use the -noid- option to stop it calculating the underidentification
and weak identification statistics. These are the routines that call
-ranktest- (which calls -rkstat-).
Cheers,
Mark
>
> Regards,
>
> Erasmo
>
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Erasmo Giambona
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi Mark,
> >
> > I updated ivreg2, xtivreg2, ranktest and then stata, but
> unfortunately
> > this did not fix my problem.
> >
> > Perhaps, anothe piece of useful information is that XTIVREG gets me
> > the results within 5-10 minutes, while XTIVREG2 runs for
> more about 2
> > hours before returning the error message.
> >
> > Any other suggestions would be truly appreciated,
> >
> > Erasmo
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Schaffer, Mark E
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Erasmo,
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: [email protected]
> >>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> >>> Erasmo Giambona
> >>> Sent: 20 January 2009 16:57
> >>> To: [email protected]
> >>> Subject: Re: st: RE: 3200 conformability error: XTIVREG2
> >>> versus XTIVREG
> >>>
> >>> Hi Martin,
> >>>
> >>> Was your message intended for me? If so, could you please be more
> >>> explicit on how it applies?
> >>
> >> I posted the original Statalist message that Martin linked
> to. It's
> >> pretty clear, I think: check that your installations of -xtivreg2-,
> >> -ivreg2- etc. are fully up-to-date.
> >>
> >> And while you're at it, check that your installation of
> Stata is also
> >> fully up-to-date (use the -update- command).
> >>
> >> These measures usually solve the problem.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Mark
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Erasmo
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Martin Weiss
> >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > Line for the server...
> >>> >
> >>> > http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2008-08/msg00650.html
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > HTH
> >>> > Martin
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > -----Original Message-----
> >>> > From: [email protected]
> >>> > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> >>> Erasmo Giambona
> >>> > Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 5:25 PM
> >>> > To: statalist
> >>> > Subject: st: 3200 conformability error: XTIVREG2 versus XTIVREG
> >>> >
> >>> > Dear Statalist,
> >>> >
> >>> > I am running a regression model using XTIVREG2 with the the
> >>> robust and
> >>> > cluster options for a panel dataset of about 1650 firms (8,717
> >>> > observations in total). The model includes more than 500 dummies
> >>> > resulting from the interaction of year and industry dummies as
> >>> > instruments for the first stage. Unfortunately, I get
> the following
> >>> > error message:
> >>> >
> >>> > order(): 3200 conformability error
> >>> > _symeigen_work(): - function returned error
> >>> > _symeigensystem(): - function returned error
> >>> > symeigensystem(): - function returned error
> >>> > rkstat(): - function returned error
> >>> > <istmt>: - function returned error
> >>> > r(3200);
> >>> >
> >>> > The model runs fine, if I use XTIVREG instead of XTIVREG2.
> >>> >
> >>> > Does anyone have any hints on why this might be happening?
> >>> >
> >>> > Thanks,
> >>> >
> >>> > Erasmo Giambona
> >>> > *
> >>> > * For searches and help try:
> >>> > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> >>> > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> >>> > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> >>> >
> >>> > *
> >>> > * For searches and help try:
> >>> > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> >>> > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> >>> > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> >>> >
> >>> *
> >>> * For searches and help try:
> >>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> >>> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> >>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Heriot-Watt University is a Scottish charity
> >> registered under charity number SC000278.
> >>
> >>
> >> *
> >> * For searches and help try:
> >> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> >> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> >> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> >>
> >
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
--
Heriot-Watt University is a Scottish charity
registered under charity number SC000278.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
