Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: RE: saving local macros


From   "Ashim Kapoor" <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: RE: saving local macros
Date   Wed, 7 Jan 2009 22:34:13 +0530

Well in my opinion the do file won't do. Simply because the 1st half
of my code is proprietary, I dont wnat any1 to see it. I do wnat them
to USE the local macros / dataset at the end of the 1st half. Maybe I
am more clear now.

Thank you,
Ashim.

On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 10:26 PM, Nick Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
> A matrix could not be used for macros with string content. (Strictly,
> all macros are strings, but clearly some have numeric content.)
>
> Nick
> [email protected]
>
> Philipp Rehm
>
> I think that's what do-files are for.
>
> Nevertheless: how about building up a matrix which contains the local
> macros you encounter, which you then save into a variable? You could
> then recover the local macros with -levelsof-, for example.
>
> But I guess a do-file is the more straightforward approach...
>
>
> Ashim Kapoor wrote:
>> I somehow feel that you can save local macros in a way other than
>> using -notes- can you ??
>>
>
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index