Ok thanks for all the comments...
with the -capture block the do-file is running,
BUT
is actually producing no output after the first error.
This is the part of my do-file (to make it more quick only until Number 3)
capture {
forvalues k=1/3{
if `k' < 100 local k 0`k'
if `k' < 10 local k 0`k'
forvalues year=2/7 {
svyset [pw=Q1170_0`year']
svy: tab Q0`k'_0`year'
mat Q0`k'_0`year' = (e(Prop)\e(total))
}
}
}
The first error occurs after the first run of the second forvalues
(forvalues year=2/7 {) loop (number 3).
With the capture block, the do-file is working, but the mat command
only produces a matrix until the first error (a matrix only for year
=2). Thus, I assume, that it is not working totally.
With adding -noisily the do file stops when the first error occurs.
Best
Daniel
2008/11/19 Buzz Burhans <[email protected]>:
> server
>
> Steve wrote
> "Just be aware that captured statements, whether they produce errors
> or not, show no output."
>
>
> -capture noisily {
> ...
> }-
>
> will produce output if the command does not fail and would otherwise produce
> output.
>
> So capture, with noisily added, should give you output, unless the command
> fails
>
> Buzz Burhans
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
