|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
st: drop 'em OR it depends
New semester starts in about a week.
One thing I had difficulty with last semester was getting the data
provided into the form needed for the analysis. I could get reshape to
work, but had to look it up every time, and it still took several
attempts every time.
So I've been looking again at Hills and De Stavola, "A short
introduction to Stata for biostatistics", chapter 9. (files at net from
http://ww.stata.com.data/hs/; net get book)
In section 9.5 they cover reshape.
In section 9.6 they cover _N and _n.
The examples in section 9.6 use the fevlong dataset. When I tried using
fevwide reshaped to long, I did not get the results in the book. Only
after dropping missing observations did it work.
So my question is, should dropping missing obs be normal practice after
reshaping from wide to long, or does it depend on what I want to do with
the long dataset?
And if I dont' drop 'em always, when do I keep them?
Tim
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/