Re: st: Problem with xtmixed

[SamL <saml@demog.berkeley.edu>]

I have wondered about the way in which xtmixed seems not to match the 
syntax of other multi-equation commands with which I am familiar.  I am 
thinking of heckman, sureg, and other such commands as examples.

I have wondered whether xtmixed matches the syntax of other multi-equation 
commands with which I am not familiar. If not, I have wondered whether 
there is any way xtmixed could be written so that the syntax matched some 
of the other multi-equation commands in stata.

So, asking explicitly: Could xtmixed be written so that the syntax matched 
some of the other multi-equation commands in stata?

Both gllamm and xtmixed *seem* very different from the usual stata syntax.

Sam
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/