... fifth attempt (now then, could it be that lotus note is what's causing
all the trouble? I'll send this one web-based)
... fourth attempt (a new subject head altogether)
... third attempt ! (adding a Re: to the subject head)
... second attempt! (new message, copy-paste content)
first attempt (simply reply to the relevant message received from
statalist)
Thanks Nick, in the future I'll make sure that my messages get posted on
the statalist archive before assuming they have been received. Not sure
which of the problems you mention is relevant to my case... oh well a
little bit of mystery is exciting once in a while...
Patrick.
[email protected]
"Nick Cox" <[email protected]>
Sent by: [email protected]
11/06/2007 21:16 CETPlease respond [email protected]
To <[email protected]>
cc
bcc
Subject RE: Re: Re: st: How to loop over non-integers?
The problem you guess at is not familiar to me.
By and large, what is not in the archives
was never sent (i.e. distributed) to the list.
The most usual reasons for postings not appearing are
that
1. People attempt to post from addresses not known
to the list, so that the list thinks that they are
not members.
2. The majordomo software catches some posts with
attachments and some with HTML or MIME encoding; however,
attachments and encoded messages manifestly do sometimes
appear.
3. Other filters also operate.
No one on the list appears to be
an expert in the internals of majordomo, so it
is difficult to be less enigmatic than that.
I know that some messages I send never appear
without apparent reason.
However, there is one rule of thumb: anything
that you send to the list that is distributed
will also be sent to you as a member. So
all valid postings should bounce back -- usually
but not invariably a few minutes later. As
some lists work otherwise -- allstat for example
sends you nothing back on a posting except e-junk
about invalid addresses -- this may be worth
bearing in mind.
Nick
[email protected]
[email protected]
> A big thank you for your help Jeph Herrin, Michael Hanson,
> Scott Merryman,
> Nick Cox.
>
> I have just noticed that some of my messages did not get posted on the
> statalist archive. If I understand correctly this means they
> have not been
> received. The messages do get saved in my "sent message"
> folder as having
> been sent to "[email protected]". It may have
> something to do
> with the subject line. The messages I send with a new subject line
> immediately appeared on statalist. But when I "reply", there
> seems to be a
> problem. Maybe the problem is that the subject line of the
> message I am
> replying to gets copied automatically without adding a "Re:". Perhaps
> sending a message with an already existing subject line
> messes things up...
> ? I will add "Re:" in front of the subject line to see if
> this one gets
> posted...
>
> I did not find anything about this in the faqs.
>
> This is embarrassing as the messages that did not get posted
> are the "thank
> you" notes I have been sending to the many who have helped me.
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
