Statalist The Stata Listserver


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: RE: invalid syntax after gllamm to predict residual


From   "Nick Cox" <[email protected]>
To   <[email protected]>
Subject   st: RE: invalid syntax after gllamm to predict residual
Date   Mon, 11 Jun 2007 17:04:26 +0100

Is -predict- a typo for -gllapred- ? 

Nick 
[email protected] 

Xiaoheng Zhang
 
> I want to estimate the random effects for each unit in a 
> random-effect model
> using xtprobit.Following Sophia Rabe-Hesketh(I attached her 
> mail to other users
> in this list at the end),I used -gllamm- to do it.The process 
> is as follows,
> 
> . gllamm y x n sa x_91 n_91 sa_91 y95-y04,i(code) 
> link(probit) fam(binom) adapt
> (estimation succeeds!)
> 
> . predict res, u   (exactly following Sophia's mail)
> invalid syntax
> r(198);
> 
> Then I tried
> . predict res, residual
> invalid syntax
> r(198);
> 
> I don't know what is the problem here.Is it wrong syntax or 
> just because I
> cannot predict residual after gllamm in this model?Thank you 
> very much for
> reading.
> 
> ================Sophia's reply to some other users===============
> If your xtprobit command was
> 
> xtprobit y x1 x2, i(id) re,
> 
> you can estimate the model in gllamm using
> 
> gllamm y x1 x2, i(id) link(probit) fam(binom) adapt
> 
> Then use
> 
> predict res, u
> 
> to get empirical Bayes predictions of the random
> effects. The posterior means will be stored in
> resm1 and the posterior standard deviations in
> ress1.
> ===end===

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index