Statalist The Stata Listserver


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

RE: st: RE: Bargraphs, order, SD


From   "Nick Cox" <[email protected]>
To   <[email protected]>
Subject   RE: st: RE: Bargraphs, order, SD
Date   Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:59:31 +0100

The help for -beamplot- explains that you can add other 
plots using the -addplot()- option. That is at your discretion. 

I don't see that there is much point in repeating advice
made earlier in the thread. Earlier posts included suggestions
on bar plots and on one way of plotting confidence intervals. 

Nick 
[email protected] 

Knag Anne-Christine
 
> Thanks! And sorry about the attachement..
> The beamplot looks nice, but this doesn�t display SE nor CI, 
> just mean. If I
> go back to using bar plots, how do I add CI and SE? Because 
> these are not
> two way plots..
> Anne-Christine
> 
> 
> On 6/11/07 4:07 PM, "Nick Cox" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > The attachment was sent contrary to Statalist protocol.
> > 
> > The version of the attachment on the StataCorp website 
> version of the
> > archives is intelligible. The version on the HSPH version
> > is not. 
> > 
> > Some possible graphs of these data are
> > 
> > . labmask tank , values(type)
> > 
> > . beamplot pre_l , over(tank) by(sex)
> > 
> > . beamplot post_l , over(tank) by(sex)
> > 
> > . beamplot growth, over(tank) by(sex)
> > 
> > As there are only 5 or 6 replicates for each tank X sex
> > combination, plotting all the original data is possible,
> > and seems a good idea.
> > 
> > Here -beamplot- and -labmask- must be installed from SSC
> > by 
> > 
> > . ssc inst beamplot
> > 
> > . ssc inst labutil
> > 
> > Your original suggestion of bar plots is also feasible.
> > 
> > Nick 
> > [email protected]
> > 
> > Knag Anne-Christine
> >  
> >> OK. I changed the original variables (1C, 1 L etc) into 
> numeric (1-9)
> >> I have attached a merge file with some of the variables. From
> >> this data I
> >> want to make 3 x 2 bar graphs over tank 1-9 showing pre_l,
> >> post_l and growth
> >> for female (F) and for male (M).
> >> Thank you for your involvement. I am a bit lost here..

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index