Did you have any specific commands in mind? I think I have an old stata
8.2 around somewhere, and I am happy to try, but I don't expect major
advantages on this specific point.
Maarten
--- Rachel <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm wondering whether Stata 9 is faster at executing non-graphics
> commands (especially time-consuming ml d0 or d1 routines) than Stata
> 8 is. I didn't see any specific claim about this on Stata's website,
> only a table of Stata's execution speed using various Pentium chips.
-----------------------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Department of Social Research Methodology
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Boelelaan 1081
1081 HV Amsterdam
The Netherlands
visiting address:
Buitenveldertselaan 3 (Metropolitan), room Z434
+31 20 5986715
http://home.fsw.vu.nl/m.buis/
-----------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Mail is the world's favourite email. Don't settle for less, sign up for
your free account today http://uk.rd.yahoo.com/evt=44106/*http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/mail/winter07.html
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
