Statalist The Stata Listserver


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: Followup: RE: ml and variable types


From   Rachel <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   st: Followup: RE: ml and variable types
Date   Fri, 22 Dec 2006 10:28:35 -0500

Thanks for everyone's responses.  It turned out that specifying
constants as scalars did indeed help the situation.

On 12/20/06, Nick Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
The answer to the first question is No. If this
were compulsory, Stata would have no problem
in detecting any deficiency and throwing you out of -ml-.

Without more detail, even an -ml- expert (not me)
might have difficulty advising here, but a guess
is that your problem is much more likely
to be with the model you are trying to estimate --
you may be trying to fit an elephant to an oak
tree -- than with variable types.

Nick
[email protected]

Rachel

> I'm wondering whether all the variables used in "ml model" equations
> need to be of type double.
>
> All my temporary variables are of type double, but the non-temp
> (external) variables used to calculate xb are floats and bytes.  "ml
> display" is giving me dots in place of the standard errors and/or the
> program seems to stop iterating, so I'm wondering whether the external
> variable types are the problem.

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index