| ![](/includes/contimages/spacer.gif) |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
st: panel GMM ivreg2, gmm; is there need of time dummies??
dear statalist,
i have a panel dataset with heteroskedasticity and serial correlation; my
basic panel model includes time dummies to catch fixed time effects. then,
i have to deal with endogeneity issues, so i employ gmm because it has
been shown (Baumm et al.) that is more efficient than the standard IV
application for panel (xtivreg). I am using ivreg2 because my model
presents random effects more efficient than fixed effect.
My question, Should I have to put time dummies even in the gmm
specification?that is, should I replace
xtreg y x t-dummies, re
with
ivreg2 y (x=z) t-dummies, gmm....
or should I cancel out time dummies??
thanks a lot!!!
--
Vincenzo Lombardo
University of Sussex, Dept. of Economics
University of Napoli Parthenope, DSE
12 Canfield Road
BN2 4DN Brighton - UK
tel. (UK):++44(0)7765991711
tel. (ITALY):++393284164302
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/