Let's distinguish two things.
-xi: regress- for example gives you, mostly, the
output of -regress-. If you don't like it, it is
largely because what -xi- does in naming variables
and what -regress- does in using variable names,
not labels. -xi- as such does not emit much.
My own posting in this thread was misleading in
not emphasising that a third possibility, that
some user has done the programming job for you, although
I doubt I'm the only person to be confused by
all the re-formatting/reporting programs which exist,
and to want StataCorp to do it "properly" (which
means my way...).
Nick
[email protected]
Richard Williams
> At 11:20 AM 8/3/2006, Roger Harbord wrote:
> >You may like to take a look at Tony Brady's -reformat- package. Type
> >-ssc describe reformat- for more info.
>
> Although it is convenient, I've always disliked the xi command
> because the output is so ugly. I'm glad to see these different
> suggestions - I'm going to try them out. Thanks.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
