|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
Re: st: Predicted probabilities after oprobit w/robust standard errors
From
Nick Winter <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: Predicted probabilities after oprobit w/robust standard errors
Date
Fri, 02 Jun 2006 08:53:11 -0400
Larger standard errors make it more likely you are further away from
the deterministic part--yes--but you could be higher, or you could be
lower. Your best guess--and therefore your prediction--is unchanged.
--NW
At 09:14 AM 6/2/2006, you wrote:
________________________________________________________At 06:55 PM 6/1/2006, Matt Barmack wrote:
Specifying cluster or robust does not seem to change the predicted
probabilities from oprobit. Does it? Shouldn't it?
Intuitively/naively, I am thinking that for an observation for which
the variance of the random part of the latent index is high, there is
a greater chance of ending up further away from what the
deterministic part of the latent index alone might suggest.
Nicholas J. G. Winter 607.255.8819 t
Assistant Professor 607.255.4530 f
Department of Government [email protected] e
Cornell University falcon.arts.cornell.edu/nw53 w
308 White Hall
Ithaca, NY 14853-4601
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |