Re: st: "no observations"

[Scott Cunningham <scunning@gmail.com>]

> I had a feeling it wasn't going to be as easy as my last message  
> suggested!  What happens if you simplify the model and drop all the  
> interaction terms?  I'm betting a global test of them would show  
> they are insignificant anyway.
I'll try this.  But any idea why -mfx- would give me that strange  
error that there are no observations?  That's what is confusing me.   
I know there are observations because I just ran the model, and it  
worked without a hitch!  So why is it telling me there is no  
observations?  (I feel like the guy in OFFICE SPACE frustrated over  
the fax machine telling him there's a paper jam, "when I know there  
is no paper jam!" for those who know the movie reference.)  ;)

sc

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/