Re: st: "no observations"

[Richard Williams <Richard.A.Williams.5@ND.edu>]

At 07:17 AM 5/2/2006, Scott Cunningham wrote:
> Richard,
>
> Okay, that wasn't it.  You were right to point out that I had
> included age in the varlist, which was not in the regression, but
> notice the following output.  It doesn't seem to matter at all.
> What's going on here?
>
> xi:xtpoisson rp srfm age2 hgc hhd1 i.year i.census i.year*i.census,
> fe i(id)
> > vce(boot)
I had a feeling it wasn't going to be as easy as my last message 
suggested!  What happens if you simplify the model and drop all the 
interaction terms?  I'm betting a global test of them would show they 
are insignificant anyway.


-------------------------------------------
Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology
OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463
FAX:    (574)288-4373
HOME:   (574)289-5227
EMAIL:  Richard.A.Williams.5@ND.Edu
WWW (personal):    http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam
WWW (department):    http://www.nd.edu/~soc 
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/