Statalist The Stata Listserver


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: arellano-bond


From   "murali n.v" <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   st: arellano-bond
Date   Mon, 30 Jan 2006 08:28:59 +0000 (GMT)

Hi all,
       I am applying arellano-bond method in an
unbalanced panel data for 30 time points(1970-1999)
for 14 countries.I am taking 26 time dummies
(discounting four years-due to differencing and taking
lags).When I run the one-step method(see below for the
code),I am getting the result without dropping any
variable or dummies.But when I am doing the
two-step(see below for code),it is droping most of the
time dummies as well as the lagged dependent variable
appearing in the RHS.What can be the likely reason and
how to solve it?(When I droped the time dummies in the
two-step,stata is not droping lagged depndent
variable)

Looking forward hopefully 
Murali

ONE_STEP
xtabond  lny  dum74 dum75 dum76 dum77 dum78 dum79
dum80 dum81 dum82 dum83 dum84 dum85 dum86 dum87 dum88
dum89 dum90 dum91 dum92 dum93 dum94 dum95  dum96 dum97
 dum98 dum99 , noconstant diffvars( lny70 sch70)
lags(3) pre(pop gcf trade,  lagstruct(2,2)) robust
artests(2)

TWO-STEP
xtabond  lny  dum74 dum75 dum76 dum77 dum78 dum79
dum80 dum81 dum82 dum83 dum84 dum85 dum86 dum87 dum88
dum89 dum90 dum91 dum92 dum93 dum94 dum95  dum96 dum97
 dum98 dum99 , diffvars( lny70 sch70) lags(3) pre(pop
gcf trade,  lagstruct(2,2))  artests(2) twostep




		
__________________________________________________________ 
Yahoo! India Matrimony: Find your partner now. Go to http://yahoo.shaadi.com
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index