Statalist The Stata Listserver


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: xthtaylor without endogenous time-invariant variables?


From   Robert Duval <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: xthtaylor without endogenous time-invariant variables?
Date   Wed, 18 Jan 2006 15:57:58 -0500

As far as I understand xttaylor helps in estimating a model in which
some of the time-invariant variables are correlated with the
unobserved time invariant effect, but you don't want to run a FE model
because this would get rid of such observed fixed variables.

If you don't have any time-invariant variable that is correlated with
the unobserved error term then why not just using standard Random
Effects?

robert

On 1/18/06, Aurora MORDONU <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> There were already two questions unanswered on the topic. I hope
> somebody managed to find the answer meanwhile...
>
>
>
> How can we use xthtaylor without endogenous time-invariant variables? If
> no endogenous constant variable is specified, one gets an error message.
>
>
>
> Thank you.
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Aurora Mordonu
>
>
> United Nations University-Comparative Regional Integration Studies
> C/o Groetseminarie
> Poterrierei 72
> 8000 Brugge
> Belgium
>
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index