Re: st: -binreg- (was: ORs for non-rare outcomes)

[Jose Maria <jmpsouza@usp.br>]

Ron�n Conroy escreveu:

> on 09/04/2004 02:18, jmpsouza@usp.br at jmpsouza@usp.br wrote:
>
> > the -binreg- command would be really a good solution, if it
> > would run more often than not run. 
> I agree, but don't be afraid of mixing -binreg- regressions with -logistic-.
> I reviewed a good paper a while back that used -binreg- for about two thirds
> of the models and, where it couldn't find a plausible solution, -logistic-
> for the rest. 
> Ronan M Conroy (rconroy@rcsi.ie)
Dear Ronan:
thank you. I did this some time ago; I am glad that  i am not alone in 
doing this.
Would you, please, tell me  the paper you reviewed?
Next week I will  turn back to this thread, with a small and apparently 
easy to run  data set that -binreg- failled to run and logistic made it 
nicely.
Greetings,
Jose Maria

--
Jose Maria Pacheco de Souza, Professor Titular
Departamento de Epidemiologia
Faculdade de Saude Publica/Universidade de Sao Paulo
Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 715	cep 01246-904
Sao Paulo	Brasil
fones (11)3082-3886  (11)3714-2403  (11)3768-8612
fax   (11)3082-2920  (11)3714-2403
www.fsp.usp.br/~jmpsouza
jmpsouza@usp.br




*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/