on 09/04/2004 02:18, [email protected] at [email protected] wrote:
> Dear people:
> I agree. Anyway, the -binreg- command would be really a good solution, if it
> would run more often than not run. Indeed, it seems that the odds of binreg be
> able to run is less than 1.
I agree, but don't be afraid of mixing -binreg- regressions with -logistic-.
I reviewed a good paper a while back that used -binreg- for about two thirds
of the models and, where it couldn't find a plausible solution, -logistic-
for the rest.
Ronan M Conroy ([email protected])
Lecturer in Biostatistics
Royal College of Surgeons
Dublin 2, Ireland
+353 1 402 2431 (fax 2764)
--------------------
Just say no to drug reps
http://www.nofreelunch.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom
they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
originator of the message. This footer also confirms that this
email message has been scanned for the presence of computer viruses.
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
sender, except where the sender specifies and with authority,
states them to be the views of The Royal College Of Surgeons in Ireland.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
