st: RE: Question Regarding _result()

["Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>]

_result() used to be the way for official commands 
to leave stuff behind. Unless you have access 
to old manuals, I recommend reverse-engineering 
in this way: 

<command> 
. disp_res   

(This shows what is available in _result().) 

. ret li 

(This shows what is available in r() stuff.) 

. eret li 

(This shows what is available in e() stuff.)