From | Michel Camus <[email protected]> |
To | [email protected] |
Subject | st: re. Poisson Regression Goodness of Fit Tests |
Date | Fri, 03 Oct 2003 09:09:50 -0400 |
Dear Statalist--
I'm generating Poisson regression models with an aggregated data set (i.e. each record in the data set represents a stratum of aggregated numbers of deaths and person-years of observation).
I wish to check that the models are not over-dispersed. The manual tells me that I can use either the 'poisgof' or the 'poisgof, pearson' command. These produce the following contradictory results:
poisgof
Goodness-of-fit chi2 = 1191.579
Prob > chi2 (5304) = 1.0000
poisgof, pearson
Goodness-of-fit chi2 = 29207.21
Prob > chi2 (5304) = 0.0000
A colleague has told me that these results have no meaning for my data set, because the degrees of freedon are incorrect (I think). He says that I should instead apply the Breslow adjusted score test (Breslow NE. Generalized linear models: checking assumptions and strengthening conclusion. Statistica Applicata 1996; 8: 23-41).
My colleague says this test is unavailable in standard stats packages, but he has programmed SAS to perform the test. He thinks it would take me 2 to 3 weeks to write a similar programme in Stata. Can anyone please advise me further on this? Has anyone attempted to programme Stata to run the adjusted score test? Are there any alternatives?
Thanks in advance
Roger Webb
University of Manchester (UK)
+44 161 275 0728
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |