on 07/06/2003 5:08 pm, Nick Cox at [email protected] wrote:
> Thus if this were to be reissued as Stata Classic in 2004,
> it would be massively popular...
Genius!
There are only two really useful tools: the one that does everything (Stata)
and the one that does only the absolutely necessary (Classic Stata).
There are lot of people who need to
- examine tables for associations
- do regression and anova
- graph summary statistics
- graph simple associations.
With Classic Stata, the manual could take a tutorial/workbook approach, and
the online help could include help on interpreting results.
I'd be able to shift a couple of dozen copies to staff here within hours.
Ronan M Conroy ([email protected])
Lecturer in Biostatistics
Royal College of Surgeons
Dublin 2, Ireland
+353 1 402 2431 (fax 2764)
--------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom
they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
originator of the message. This footer also confirms that this
email message has been scanned for the presence of computer viruses.
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
sender, except where the sender specifies and with authority,
states them to be the views of The Royal College Of Surgeons in Ireland.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
