> That is indeed a problem if you want to -list-
> 333,828 observations.
It has never been a problem, so don't ridicule my point
Obviously I just want to look at my data, but I don't want to type l in 1/100
or something like this
There is no reason for the speed of list to depend on the size of my data
If I type l, stata should just start spitting out the data
This is what stata 7 did, and this is what stata 8 should do
It's just a buggy implementation of list afaic
Ed.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
