Patrick Joly <Joly.Patrick@ic.gc.ca> wrote that he had found a case in which
the e(sample) after -xtabond- did not have the same number of ones as the
reported number of obsevations used. This was due in an error in how the
e(sample) variable was being created. The estimation sample was correctly
reported in the header, but the e(sample) variable did not correctly
recreate the estimation sample.
This will be fixed in an a forthcoming ado update.
--David
ddrukker@stata.com
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
