Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: Poolability Test - Fixed Effects, Panel Robust Errors or Roy-Zellner Test
From
Carla Müller <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
st: Poolability Test - Fixed Effects, Panel Robust Errors or Roy-Zellner Test
Date
Tue, 25 Feb 2014 23:57:33 +0000
Dear all,
I have a panel of 33 countries over 7 periods (7*3 year period
averages). I am trying to perform a test for poolability.
My restricted model is a fixed effect model with homogeneous slopes, my
unrestricted model is a fixed effect model with slopes on the variable
of interest varying across countries (maintaining the assumption that
the coefficients on all control variables are constant across
countries).
Following Vaona (2008) ("A quick trick to perform a Roy-Zellner test for
poolability") I have created 33 interaction terms between the countries
and the variable of interest and am able to run regressions with these
33 interaction terms.
My question concerns the testing procedure. Having read previous Stata
posts on this topic (see e.g.:
http://hsphsun3.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/lwgate/STATALIST/archives/statalist.0303/Subject/article-391.html) I remain unsure about which of the following approaches is valid:
(1) Run the unrestricted model including all interaction terms using a
fixed effect estimator, then use an F-test to test the equality of all
coefficients.
(2) Same procedure as in (1) but using panel robust (clustered) errors
(or alternatively bootstrapped errors) (having tested for
autocorrelation, heteroscedasticity and spatial correlation I am using
these robust errors throughout the whole paper).
Problem: Using cluster robust errors reduces the degrees of freedom and
as a result I cannot test the equality of all interaction terms
simultaneously (while I expected the degrees of freedom to be reduced to
the number of clusters-1, Stata in fact allows me to test only 14
coefficients at a time (all additional constraints are dropped))
(3) Perform a Roy-Zellner test instead of a Chow test given the presence
of non-spherical errors (e.g. "Econometrics", Baltagi 2008 ) - how would
this be different from (2) which is also robust to non-spherical errors?
Problem: How do I perform a Roy-Zellner test in this case?
Thank you for any help and advice,
Best regards,
Carla Müller
Cambridge University
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/