Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: weighting ordinal multilevel model
From
Stas Kolenikov <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
Re: st: weighting ordinal multilevel model
Date
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:18:27 -0500
As is clear from -help meologit-, it does not support weights. If you
are really interested in weighted estimation (and you should be),
you'd have to use -gllamm-. As a devil's advocate, I don't know what
the reference to Snijders & Boskers 2012 is, and what these guys
discuss and suggest, so you would want to elaborate on that. Ignoring
the sampling design will almost definitely give you wrong results.
-- Stas Kolenikov, PhD, PStat (ASA, SSC)
-- Principal Survey Scientist, Abt SRBI
-- Opinions stated in this email are mine only, and do not reflect the
position of my employer
-- http://stas.kolenikov.name
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Pritsch, Julian <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear statalist,
>
> I want to estimate an ordinal multilevel model using Stata 13 and the meologit command. Is it possible to use this command with weighted data? My data result out of a complex survey design. I would prefer (following the weighting discussion in Snijders & Boskers 2012) not to use weights but at least I want to compare the results.
>
> Any advice on that matter if weighting in multilevel data is a good idea per se?
>
>
> Cheers,
> Julian
>
>
>
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/