Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Economic significance of categorical variable
From
Ronnie Babigumira <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: Economic significance of categorical variable
Date
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 09:34:14 +0100
I suppose you have looked at
http://tien89.wordpress.com/2010/03/05/statistically-vs-economically-significant/
This may also help http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/13501780903337339
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Nerissa Fanoembi
<[email protected]> wrote:
> ear Statalist,
>
> I am wondering how I can interpret the economic significance of categorical variables.
> For example I research the effect of the employer type (public or private sector employees) on risk aversion. I find that the probability of being risk averse in the public sector is 6.3 percentage points greater than in the private sector. The sample consists of 1137 individuals. How do I know whether this effect is economic significant?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Nerissa.
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/