Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: -atts- does not produce standard errors in some cases
From
Ryan Turner <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
st: -atts- does not produce standard errors in some cases
Date
Tue, 4 Feb 2014 15:58:15 -0500
Dear Statalist,
I am using -pscore-, -atts-, and -attnd- to estimate a large number of propensity score models (Becker 2002). In some rare cases (a relatively small subset of my total model), -atts- (ATT stratification matching) produces an estimate for ATT, but the standard error is missing (.). -attnd- on these same models produces valid (not missing) standard errors.
What could cause this? The missing SEs are well distributed across my model types, so I can't directly attribute it to my model (e.g., using an all-dummies pscore specification in some cases). My only thought is that maybe I could try bootstrapping my standard errors.
I recognize I haven't given enough information to fully answer this question (e.g., a minimum reproducible example); my goal is simply to understand what might be happening, so any thoughts are appreciated.
Best,
Ryan
References:
Becker, S. O., & Ichino, A. (2002). Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores. The Stata Journal, 2(4), 358–377.
--
Ryan J. Turner <[email protected]>
Engineering and Public Policy
Carnegie Mellon University
+1-412-304-5014 (C) | +1-484-483-3244 (GV)
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/