Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: Non-working SROOT options
From
"Francis, Richard N" <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
st: Non-working SROOT options
Date
Tue, 7 Jan 2014 18:28:30 +0000
Hi Statalist,
A heads-up . . . this is a problem associated with the functionality/failure of a user-written program rather than a user-programming problem per se.
A user-written program from SJ v9, n3, pp. 422-38 (ST-0172) provides enhancements to a seasonal unit root test developed by Hylleberg, et al. (J of Econometrics, v44, 1990).
Page 426 of this article provides the syntax, including the options, for the -SROOT- command.
However, I am finding that the -season(varlist)- option for the -SROOT- command is not functional in a stand-alone manner.
For example, the following syntax works great:
sroot varname, trend season(varlist)
The following syntax also works great:
sroot varname, trend
However, the following syntax fails:
sroot varname, season(varlist)
Stata provides the following error message associated with the failure:
5.15\ not found
r(111);
The discussion on page 426 of SJ (v9, n3) concerning the -season(varlist)- option indicates that this option may not be used with the -noconstant- option.
Note that the examples above avoid this combination, yet the command continues to fail.
Although what I know about Stata fits neatly within the eye of a small needle, I did set the trace feature 'ON' and narrowed the problem to a section of the code which retrieves critical values.
In a nutshell, the various model specifications for the testing procedure require varying critical values.
It 'APPEARS' that the code fails while attempting to retrieve the critical values for the stand-alone use of -season(varlist)- .
The stand-alone use of -season(varlist)- is legitimate and appropriate, as this specification appears in the original Hylleberg (1990) article on page 226 (J of Econometrics, v44, 1990) in the third horizontal group of auxiliary regressions/model specifications in Table 1A.
I am unsure how to rectify this problem, but thought that posting this message could possibly assist other Stata users, as well as the editorial staff at Stata.
I apologize if this is the inappropriate method for resolving the issue.
Thank you,
Rick
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/