Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | Scott Merryman <scott.merryman@gmail.com> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | Re: st: constant in -xtreg (yes, again!) |
Date | Tue, 3 Dec 2013 16:17:47 -0600 |
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 2:48 PM, jean-luc morin-chesnel <jeanluc.morinchesnel@gmail.com> wrote: > > Next, by looking at the example I tried to recover the constant > reported in -xtreg from the regression with dummy variables. Am I > correct to compute > > 7.545455 (constant of the fe estimator) =( 4 + (4-2.5) + (4+4.333) + > (4+10.333))/4 > 7.0415 > (the average > of the fixed effects in the regression dummy specification) > ? > You need to account for the unequal size of the groups. clear input group x y 1 0 -5 1 8 23 1 17 44 2 10 29 2 16 26 3 4 17 3 11 17 3 5 31 4 18 50 4 5 26 4 2 17 end list xtreg y x, fe i(group) regress y x i.group disp (3*_b[_cons] +2*(_b[_cons]+_b[2.group])+ 3*(_b[_cons]+_b[3.group]) +3*(_b[_cons]+_b[4.group]))/11 Scott * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/