Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
R: st: R: anova account for the same individuals
From
"Carlo Lazzaro" <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
R: st: R: anova account for the same individuals
Date
Thu, 21 Nov 2013 08:54:18 +0100
Dear David,
Thanks for your remark. I see your point.
Does it hold even though the IV group does not reach statistical significance in two-way ANOVA (as it occurred in my fictitious code)?
I would also consider MANOVA for Liling's example, provided that the IV group can be divided (say) in two categorical variables (eg, male and female).
Kind regards,
Carlo
-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Per conto di David Hoaglin
Inviato: mercoledì 20 novembre 2013 16:59
A: [email protected]
Oggetto: Re: st: R: anova account for the same individuals
Carlo,
One-way ANOVA is not appropriate for data such as Liling has, because of the repeated measures.
David Hoaglin
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 6:08 AM, Carlo Lazzaro <[email protected]> wrote:
> After two-way ANOVA, already recommended by other Statalisters have,
> Liling may want to go -contrast- (provided he gains access to Stata 12
> at his department. I am not sure that Stata 11.2 provides -contrast- as well).
> Otherwise, Liling can keep it simpler with one-way ANOVA followed by
> multiple comparisons among rates.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/