Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | David Hoaglin <dchoaglin@gmail.com> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | Re: st: Transformation of variable with pos/neg values via asinh |
Date | Tue, 19 Nov 2013 08:13:17 -0500 |
Nick, I'm in favor of "if it helps." I would classify volume and gamma distributions as "amounts," however, not "balances." As a quirky example related to the cube root, I like the relation between the gauges of shotguns (e.g., 10, 12, and 14) and the diameters of their barrels. Before the diameters were standardized, the gauge of a shotgun (or a musket) was equal to the number of lead balls of the barrel diameter needed to make a weight of 1 pound. Thus, the gauge is proportional to the reciprocal cube root of the barrel diameter. The Wilson-Hilferty approximation is supported by solid analysis. David Hoaglin On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com> wrote: > Nothing depends on my one-off terminology. Perhaps "inputs" and > "outputs" capture my meaning better. > > The leading examples I know of for cube roots are > > volumes go to lengths > > and > > gammas go to Gaussians (to a good approximation; "Wilson-Hilferty" is > a known incantation here) > > and everything else is a matter of "if it helps". > Nick > njcoxstata@gmail.com * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/