Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: R: Hurdle models vs. zero inflated models
From
"Carlo Lazzaro" <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
st: R: Hurdle models vs. zero inflated models
Date
Mon, 18 Nov 2013 10:34:11 +0100
Pooja may want to take a look at the following article published on Stata
Journal:
http://www.stata-journal.com/sjpdf.html?articlenum=st0040
Best regards,
Carlo
-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] Per conto di Pooja Desai
Inviato: lunedì 18 novembre 2013 10:21
A: [email protected]
Oggetto: st: Hurdle models vs. zero inflated models
Hello All,
I have a variable which represents the length of stay in the hospital for
patients. 90% of the patients were not hospitalized so they have a
0 length of stay. I was considering using either a zero-inflated negative
binomial regression or a hurdle model (logit and zero truncated negative
binomial) for this variable. Since all the zeros on the length of stay come
from one source?the patients not having a hospitalization, I thought a
hurdle model would be a better option (there are no sampling zeros). Is that
an appropriate choice?
If so, I need to find the predicted length of stay from the model. Is there
a way to get the predicted value after accounting for both the logistic and
zero truncated negative binomial models?
Thanks in advance.
Pooja Desai
Health Outcomes and Pharmacy Practice
The University of Texas at Austin
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/