Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: understanding weights in a -xtreg panel regression
From
jean-luc morin-chesnel <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
st: understanding weights in a -xtreg panel regression
Date
Sat, 9 Nov 2013 14:39:13 +0100
Dear all,
I would like to understand what the weights do in a fixed effect
regression using -xtreg in Stata.
So assume I run the following model
Y_it=Alpha + Beta*X_it + Epsilon_i + Epsilon2_it
(where I keep Stata's definition of a fixed effect regression: i.e. a
baseline constant and an individual time-invariant error term)
Consider that Y_it is a return earned on some investment done by
investor i at time t, and that I would like to weight the returns by
the amount engaged on each investment (M_it). That is higher returns
earned when the amount engaged is high should be more "important" than
higher returns earnied when the amount is lower.
Should I type -xtreg Y X [aw=M], fe ?
Are the weight defined separately for each investor? Which weights
should I use? I am confused by the definition of aweight (or analytic
weights, are weights that are inversely proportional to the variance
ofan observation; that is, the variance of the jth observation is
assumed to be sigma^2/w_j, where w_j are the weights.) Are they
appropriate in that situation?
Many thanks for your help and remarks
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/