Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Interpretation of coefficients for predictor with linear and quadratic terms in negative binomial regression
From
Richard Williams <[email protected]>
To
[email protected], "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
Re: st: Interpretation of coefficients for predictor with linear and quadratic terms in negative binomial regression
Date
Mon, 21 Oct 2013 10:24:08 -0500
At 11:10 PM 10/20/2013, Rachael Wills wrote:
Dear all,
I am trying to quantify the effect of the occupancy (%) of child
care centres on the tendency of children to take extended departures
from the centre.
I am using -nbreg- in Stata MP 12.1 to run a negative binomial
regression where the outcome is the number of children at a centre
taking an extended departure during the year (variable is called
'exits') with an offset term containing the number of children
attending the centre at all during the year (variable is called
'children'). A scatterplot of 'exits' as a percentage of 'children'
against occupancy (%) suggests that a term in occupancy squared may
also be necessary, and indeed both linear and quadratic terms are
significant at the 95% level in the model:
gen occ2 = occ^2
nbreg exits occ occ2, exposure(children)
My question then, is how I can interpret the dual coefficients for
the occupancy terms. Is it best to use the coefficients, or can a
simpler interpretation be made using the -irr- option? I would like
to be able to provide a statement such as 'For every 1% increase in
occupancy there is a X decrease in the exit rate'. However, I'm not
even sure if such a simple statement is possible when there are both
linear and quadratic terms involved.
Personally I would do
nbreg exits occ c.occ#c.occ, exposure(children)
Then I would use commands like margins or the user written mcp. See
http://www3.nd.edu/~rwilliam/xsoc73994/Margins01.pptx
http://www3.nd.edu/~rwilliam/xsoc73994/Margins03.pdf
You may also wish to see Vince Wiggins' post at
http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2013-01/msg00293.html
Among many other things, he says "When we regress mileage on weight
and weight squared, we are simply admitting that a linear
relationship doesn't match the data, and we need some flexibility in
the relationship between mileage and weight. We do not think that
weight squared has its own interpretation."
-------------------------------------------
Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology
OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463
HOME: (574)289-5227
EMAIL: [email protected]
WWW: http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/