Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | Urvashi Rathod <urvashi.srathod@gmail.com> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | st: Regarding Kendall Coefficient of Concordance |
Date | Mon, 14 Oct 2013 15:27:38 +0530 |
The study in question is with multi-level rank order: Three levels of hierarchy were identified based on the findings of extensive exploration as given below: Category Area Factors In confirmatory survey, practitioners were asked to rank 5 categories within themselves (level 1 rank order). Then they were supposed to rank the areas within each category (level 2 rank order). For example: Category 1 Category 2 Rank Rank Area11 Area21 Area12 Area22 Area13 Area23 Area14 Area24 Area15 Area25 Area16 And so on… Within each area, factors were asked to be ranked (level 3 rank order). All identified items were theoretically orthogonal and no rank order had more than 7 items. We applied Kendall’s W at every level separately. Statistically, can it be objectionable? Is there any other rank order test suitable to given scenario? Thanks! * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/