Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: Problem with variables in glamm


From   "Alice Dalton (MED)" <[email protected]>
To   "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject   st: Problem with variables in glamm
Date   Mon, 7 Oct 2013 11:53:51 +0000

Dear Statlist,

I'm having a problem with the gllamm program (family(binomial) link(logit)).

1. My dependant variable (a proportion) will only work if the variable contains a zero, otherwise I get an r(2000) (no observations) error

2. Adding binary explanatory variables (eg a health variable where 1 excellent, 0 not excellent) results in the message 'variables have been dropped, can't continue' and an r(198) error. The null model works; the null model works with continuous variables added in; the null model plus one or more binary variables fails.

The command I am using is     gllamm  [depvar] [varlist], i(ParticipantId) family(binomial) link(logit). I have 276 cases and 129 variables (not all of which are added to the model).

If anyone with experience of gllamm has an idea of what is happening here, I would be most grateful to hear it. 

Thank you!

Alice Dalton

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index