Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: "Can Your Results be Replicated?" (Stata error?)
From
Anders Alexandersson <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: "Can Your Results be Replicated?" (Stata error?)
Date
Fri, 13 Sep 2013 09:14:42 -0400
I just made this reply on the blog:
"Where is the error in Stata? The author’s so called “Do-File for
Analyses.txt” is actually not a Stata do file but it does refer to
Stata’s user-written command -firthlogit- from SSC. Please provide a
reproducible do-file in Stata.The claim that results and conclusions
were due to an error in Stata is not supported."
See http://politicalsciencereplication.wordpress.com/2013/09/11/guest-blog-how-to-persuade-journals-to-accept-your-replication-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-653
Anders Alexandersson
[email protected]
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Philip Jones
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I found a link on my Twitter feed this AM, purporting to show how
> Stata "made a mistake" that R did not make:
>
> http://www.r-bloggers.com/can-your-results-be-replicated/
>
> which actually points to:
>
> http://politicalsciencereplication.wordpress.com/2013/09/11/guest-blog-how-to-persuade-journals-to-accept-your-replication-paper/
>
> I realize that "r-bloggers" is likely not the most bias-free site when
> it comes to reviewing/rating stats packages, but has anyone got an
> idea as to what is actually going on here? Is Stata really at fault?
>
> Regards,
>
> Phil
> @pmgjones on Twitter
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/