Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: -confirm variable- does not accept varlist (wildcards)


From   Nick Cox <[email protected]>
To   "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject   Re: st: -confirm variable- does not accept varlist (wildcards)
Date   Thu, 5 Sep 2013 16:58:28 +0100

Sorry, poor wording. I was relying too much on context. I use wildcard
varlists all the time; I've just never wanted to use them within
-confirm- (that I can remember).

Nick
[email protected]


On 5 September 2013 16:29, Joe Canner <[email protected]> wrote:
> Nick,
>
> I'm intrigued by your last sentence in #2.  Are you've saying you've never had occasion to use wildcards in varlists, or that there are alternatives?  For example, suppose you wanted to do something with all system-generated variables _*, knowing that these might be scattered around the dataset and not contiguous.  How would you do that without wildcards?


Nick Cox

> On the question:
>
> 1. It seems that you are right. -confirm- does not support wildcard varlists.
>
> 2. But I've never noticed this before. That just means what it says, but in 20 years of writing a fair number of programs, I've never wanted to try out a wildcard varlist.

On 5 September 2013 15:30, Nick Cox <[email protected]> wrote:

>> . sysuse auto, clear
>> (1978 Automobile Data)
>>
>> . confirm var m*
>> m ambiguous abbreviation
>> r(111);
>>
>> . unab m : m*
>>
>> . confirm var `m'

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index