Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: -reshape- question [was: Re: st: Thread-Index: <random garbage>]
From
Nickolas Lyell <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
RE: -reshape- question [was: Re: st: Thread-Index: <random garbage>]
Date
Fri, 23 Aug 2013 10:50:36 -0400
Haha, Thanks Nick.
Maybe always the best answer. Just being a bit lazy I suppose. (there is a lot of renaming for 3-digit NAICS codes)
--
Nick
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nick Cox
Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 10:40 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: -reshape- question [was: Re: st: Thread-Index: <random garbage>]
Here the best way to learn it is probably to try what you want -- and come back to us if you don't understand the results.
I know that could be an answer to almost any question, but I give it nevertheless.
Nick
[email protected]
On 23 August 2013 15:25, Nickolas Lyell <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ok. So when I am attempting to reshape long in time (after the very wide transformation), I will Most likely want to rename my variables to reshape long in time, correct? (from dec1990211) with "1990" being the year part and "211" being the NAICS code.
>
> As long as I rename them "NAICS2111990", Stata will understand which part identifies the year? Or will I have to indicate that in the reshape command?
>
>
> Nicholas Lyell
> Research Associate
> National Association of Counties | NACo [email protected] | 202.661.8820
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nick Cox
> Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 10:11 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: -reshape- question [was: Re: st: Thread-Index: <random garbage>]
>
> Numeric digits 0...9 are fine in variable names so long as they are not offered as first character. Just specify a stub you like in -j()-.
>
> Nick
> [email protected]
>
>
> On 23 August 2013 14:54, Nickolas Lyell <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I seem to remember a warning against using numbers for variable names in the reshape command, but I wanted to make sure.
>>
>> I have a list of county GDP by industry with Industry by county long and GDP by year wide. I would like to invert this so that I have years by county long and GDP by industry wide. I know that I cannot use variable names that are more than one word long when transforming to wide, so I would like to turn the “description” variable into it’s industry NAICS code. IE: “GDP: Educational Services” → 611 .
>>
>> My data is formatted like this:
>>
>> County description 1990 1991 1992 …
>> 1 611 512.2 436.7 347.9 …
>> 1 612 63.4 67.8 83.4 …
>>
>>
>> Can I use the 3-digit NAICS codes to reshape my data into wide with numbers as NAICS (year-NIACS) so that I can then reshape it long (so it can be a time series)?
>>
>>
>> Nicholas Lyell
>> Research Associate
>> National Association of Counties | NACo [email protected] | 202.661.8820
>>
>>
>> *
>> * For searches and help try:
>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/